RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form
M.M. Eswarudu1*, T. Narendra Chary1, Sunil Junapudi1, M. Sushma2.
1.Department of pharmaceutical analysis, Anurag pharmacy college, Ananthagiri(V), Kodad(M), Nalgonda (Dt), Andhra Pradesh, India.508206
2.D.C.R.M. Pharmacy College, Inkollu, Prakasham Dist, Andhra Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: eswarmunnangi@gmail.com,sunilpharma49@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple, reproducible and efficient high performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for simultaneous determination of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in tablets. A Hypersil pack BDS C18 column 250X4.6 mm 5µ particle size in isocratic mode with mobile phase containing acetonitrile: Buffer (sodium acetate anhydrous) (55:45 v/v ) adjusted to pH 3.5 using ortho phosphoric acid. The flow rate was 1.0 ml/min and effluent was monitored at 260 nm. The retention time and linearity range for Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide were (2.98, 4.83 min) and (5-200, 1-400 μg/ml), respectively. The developed method was found to be accurate, precise and selective for simultaneous determination of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in tablet dosage form.
KEYWORDS: Irbesartan, Hydrochlorothiazide, RP-HPLC, simultaneous determination, Validation.
Irbesartan (IRB) is chemically 2-Butyl-3-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl) benzyl]-1, 3-diazaspiro [4.4] non-1-en-4-one1 and is used as antihypertensive agent. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is chemically 6-Chloro-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,2,4-benzothiadiazine-7-sulphonamide 1,1-dioxide2 and is used as class of Diuretic compounds. Both of these drugs are available in combined tablet dosage form with the label claim of IRB 150 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg per tablet. Literature survey of IRB and HCTZ revealed few methods based on chromatography3-38,electrochemical methods39, high performance thin layer chromatography 40, 41 and spectrophotometry 42-52 either in single or in combined forms. The present work describes the development and validation of reverse phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RPHPLC) method, which can quantify these components simultaneously. Confirmation of the applicability of the developed method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) 53 for the simultaneous determination of IRB and HCTZ in bulk and in tablet dosage form.
Figure1: Molecular structure of Hydrochlorothiazide
Figure2: Molecular structure of Irbesartan
MATERIALS AND METHODS53:
Preparation of buffer:
Weigh accurately about 8.3g of sodium acetate anhydrous and transfer it into 1000 ml volumetric flask and made up to the mark with double distilled water. Mix the contents to dissolve. Adjust the pH of the above mixture to 3.5 ± 0.005 using ortho phosphoric acid.
Preparation of mobile phase:
Take Acetonitrile and buffer in the ratio of 55:45 (v/v). Mix the content, filter through 0.4 µ membrane filter and degas with ultrasonicator.
Standard stock Preparation:
Weigh and transfer accurately about 75.0 mg of Irbesartan and 6.3mg of Hydrochlorothiazide Working Standard into a 25 ml clean dry volumetric flask, add about 15 ml of methanol, sonic ate for 5 minutes, and dilute to volume with diluent (mobile phase).
Diluted Standard:
Pipette out 1ml from the standard stock solution, into a 25 ml clean dry volumetric flask, and dilute to the mark with 25 ml of diluent.
Sample preparation:
Weigh and powder about twenty tablets in a neat clean and dry motor and pestle grind and mix to uniform powder. weigh and transfer accurately about 0.2gm of the tablet powder into 25ml clean dry volumetric flask, add about 15ml of diluent (mobile phase) sonic ate for 5 minutes, and dilute to volume with mobile phase. filter through 0.4 µ membrane filter, from the filtrate pipette out 1ml of sample solution into a 25ml volumetric flask, make up the volume with diluent (mobile phase).
Chromatographic Conditions:
Freshly prepared acetonitrile and Buffer 55:45 (v/v) adjust PH 3.5 were filtered through 0.45µ membrane filter and sonicate before use. Flow rate of Mobile phase was maintained at 1.0 ml/min. the column temperature was ambient temperature. The detection was carried out at 260 nm. Injection Volume 20µL and total run time was 10 min. Column was 4.6 mm×250 mm C18 column, 5µ particle size.
System suitability parameters53:
System suitability tests are an integral part of chromatographic method. They were used verify that the reproducibility of chromatographic system are adequate for analysis. To ascertain its effectiveness, System suitability tests were carried out on freshly prepared standard stock solution of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide. In addition to this standard deviation of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide standards were evaluated by injecting a mixed standard of both Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide as internal standard five times at 15 min interval and the values were recorded. All the above parameters are shown in
Table -1 System suitability parameters
|
Parameters \Drugs |
Irbesartan |
Hydrochloro-thiazide |
|
Tailing factor |
1.22 |
1.24 |
|
Theoretical plates |
4476.6 |
6733.6 |
|
Resolution |
9.52 |
|
|
Relative standard deviation |
0.401525 |
0.290616 |
Assay procedure:
Weigh the content of not lees then 20 tablets Irbesartan of and Hydrochlorothiazide to mortar and pestle, grind and mix to uniform powder. Transfer an accurately weighed portion of powder, equivalent about one tablet into 100 ml volumetric flask containing 40 ml of mobile phase. Mix thoroughly to dissolve and make up to volume with mobile phase. Filter the solution through whatmann filter paper. Pipette out 5 ml of the filtrate into 50 ml of volumetric flask make up volume and filter through 0.45 µ membrane filter. Chromatograph the standard preparation and record the chromatograms and measure the peak responses. The tailing factor for the principal peak is not more than 2.0 and the number of the theoretical plates is not less than 2500. The % RSD (Relative Standard Deviation) is not more then 2.0. Separately inject 20 µl of standard preparation and assay preparation in the chromatograph, record the chromatograms and measure the responses for the major peaks. The amount of drug present in tablet formulation was calculated as follows:
Assay of tablet dosage form:
Applicability of the proposed method of the simultaneous estimation of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide was studied by assay of commercial tablets Xarb-H label to contain Irbesartan 150mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg. The results indicate that the amount of each drug in the tablets is with in the requirements of 98-102%of the label claim.
Table.2
|
Drug |
Amount |
% label claim |
|
|
Labeled |
Measured |
||
|
Irbesartan |
150mg |
148.918mg |
99.28 |
|
Hydrochlorothiazide |
12.5mg |
12.4mg |
99.54 |
Fig-3: Typical chromatogram of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide (Standard)
Fig-4: Typical chromatogram of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide (sample)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 54, 55:
In order to develop simultaneous estimation of two components under isocratic conditions, the mixture of acetonitrile with buffer in different ratios were assayed as the mobile phase. A mixture of buffer and acetonitrile in different ratios were also tried for the assay of combined dosage forms. Finally a mixture of acetonitrile- sodium acetate buffer in ratio of 55:45(v/v), proved to be the effective mixture than the other mixture used for the separation. Then the flow rates tested includes 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 ml, among these flow rates 1.0 ml was selected for the assay because better resolution of the peaks. System suitability test was applied to freshly prepare stock solution of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide, to check the parameters like Tailing factors, Resolution, Theoretical plates, Relative standard deviation as shown in Table-1. Linear correlation was obtained between peak areas and concentration of Hydrochlorothiazide and Irbesartan in the range of 5-200μg/ml and 1-400 μg/ml respectively. Data of the regression analysis are summarized in Table- 3,4. The developed method was studied for precision. The precision of the method was demonstrated by at least six determinations in method precision. Standard deviation and the results are given in Table-5,6. The accuracy of the proposed RP-HPLC method was expressed in terms of recovery. The recovery studies was carried out and given in terms of percentage recovery and given in Table -7,8. The proposed method was found to be simple, species, specific and highly accurate, required less time consumption for analysis and this can be employed for the routine analysis.
Table.3 Linearity of Irbesartan
|
Conc. (μg/ml) |
Average area |
Statistical Analysis |
|
|
20 |
89.766 |
Slope |
5.1189 |
|
40 |
189.629 |
y-Intercept |
- 14.753 |
|
60 |
290.797 |
Limit of detection |
2.3968396 |
|
80 |
390.12 |
Limit of quantification |
7.2631503 |
|
100 |
503.213 |
Correlation coefficient (R2) |
0.9989 |
|
120 |
589.214 |
||
|
140 |
717.977 |
||
|
160 |
796.858 |
||
Fig: 5 Linearity graph of Irbesartan
Table-4 Linearity of Hydrochlorothiazide
|
Conc (μg/ml) |
Average area |
Statistical Analysis |
|
|
20 |
48.979 |
Slope |
2.7995 |
|
40 |
104.243 |
y-Intercept |
- 9.5735 |
|
60 |
157.375 |
Limit of detection |
1.75143 |
|
80 |
206.11 |
Limit of quantification |
5.30736 |
|
100 |
271.658 |
Correlation coefficient (R2) |
0.9984 |
|
120 |
323.929 |
||
|
140 |
392.663 |
||
|
160 |
434.103 |
||
Fig: 6 Linearity graph of Hydrochlorothiazide
Table-5 Method Precision of Irbesartan
|
Concentration 100% |
Injection |
Rt Irbesartan |
Peak Areas of Irbesartan |
|
1 |
4.823 |
503.122 |
|
|
2 |
4.827 |
507.643 |
|
|
3 |
4.827 |
506.702 |
|
|
4 |
4.827 |
512.719 |
|
|
5 |
4.823 |
513.217 |
|
StatisticalAnalysis |
Mean |
4.8254 |
508.5806 |
|
SD |
0.027979 |
4.26614 |
|
|
% RSD |
0.0203049 |
0.838833 |
Table-6 Method Precision of Hydrochlorothiazide
|
Concentration 100% |
Injection |
Hydrochlorothiazide Rt |
Peak Areas of Hydrochlorothiazide |
|
1 |
2.98 |
277.226 |
|
|
2 |
2.98 |
278.376 |
|
|
3 |
2.983 |
278.346 |
|
|
4 |
2.99 |
276.749 |
|
|
5 |
2.993 |
275.545 |
|
StatisticalAnalysis |
Mean |
2.983 |
276.267 |
|
SD |
2.984833 |
277.0848 |
|
|
% RSD |
0.005419 |
1.134046 |
Table-7 Accuracy (Recovery):
|
Concentration of Irbesartan |
Peak area |
Amount found |
%Recovery |
Statistical Analysis |
|
|
standard 80mcg |
370.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
365.414 |
78.9828 |
98.728 |
MEAN |
98.69433 |
|
2 |
367.578 |
79.45 |
99.313 |
SD |
0.636168 |
|
3 |
362.873 |
78.433 |
98.042 |
%RSD |
0.6445 |
|
standard 100mcg |
503.213 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
505.837 |
100.52 |
100.52 |
MEAN |
100.2517 |
|
2 |
501.921 |
99.74 |
99.74 |
SD |
0.443293 |
|
3 |
505.704 |
100.495 |
100.495 |
%RSD |
0.4422 |
|
standard 120mcg |
589.214 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
587.038 |
119.59 |
99.66 |
MEAN |
99.94867 |
|
2 |
589.958 |
120.15 |
100.126 |
SD |
0.252161 |
|
3 |
589.556 |
120.06 |
100.06 |
%RSD |
0.25229 |
Table-8 Accuracy (Recovery)
|
Concentration of Hydrochlorothiazide |
Peak Area |
Amount found |
%Recovery |
Statistical Analysis |
|
|
standard 80mcg |
2065.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
209.898 |
81.47 |
101.83 |
MEAN |
99.99467 |
|
2 |
202.472 |
78.587 |
98.234 |
SD |
1.799645 |
|
3 |
205.957 |
79.94 |
99.92 |
%RSD |
0.0179925 |
|
standard 100mcg |
271.658 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
274.849 |
101.116 |
101.12 |
MEAN |
100.79 |
|
2 |
276.242 |
101.68 |
101.68 |
SD |
1.091100 |
|
3 |
270.499 |
99.57 |
99.57 |
%RSD |
0.010825 |
|
standard 120mcg |
323.929 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
320.682 |
118.797 |
98.99 |
MEAN |
99.61 |
|
2 |
323.64 |
119.89 |
99.91 |
SD |
0.19226 |
|
3 |
323.717 |
119.92 |
99.93 |
%RSD |
0.31005 |
CONCLUSION:
The developed RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in combined forms. The method was found to be simple, precise and rapid. The assay result obtained by this method is in fair agreement. This method can be used for the routine determination of Irbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide in commercial formulations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
I am very much thankful to Dr. M. chinna eswaraiah, Principal, Anurag Pharmacy College For his guidance, kind help and constant encouragement at every step during the progress of my work without which successful completion of this work would not have been possible. It is my pleasure to express my sincere thanks to Dr.P.RajeshwarReddy, correspondent and secretary, Amartya educational society, for his providing laboratory facilities and chemicals. I am also grateful to my friends for their kind help from time to time at each and every step of my project work.
REFERENCES:
1. Martindale: The complete drug reference. 36th edition, Pharmaceutical press, Lambeth High Street, London. 1316, 2009.
2. Martindale: The complete drug reference. 36th edition, Pharmaceutical press, Lambeth High Street, London. 1307-1311, 2009.
3. S. K. Bae, MJ. Kim, EJ. Shim, D. Y. Cho, J. H. Shon, K. H. Liu, EY. Kim and J. G. Shin. Biomed. Chromatography. 23(6): 568-72 (2009).
4. A. K. Shakya, Y. M. Al-Hiari and O. M. Alhamami. J Chromatogr B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 848(2):245-50 (2007).
5. N. Sultana, M. S. Arayne, M. Saeed, S. S. Ali, and S. Sajid. Chinese. J. Chromatograph. 26(5):544-549 (2008).
6. K. Be-sheng, M. Arun, R. O. David, H. Kin-Kai. Pharma. Resear. 7(12):1257-1261(1990).
7. F. Liu, Y. Xu, S. Gao, J. Zhang, Q. Guo. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 44(5): 1187-1191(2007).
8. Zou, Gu. J.J, Li X. X, Zhu. Y.j, Yu.Y.b, Qian C.x, Xiao. W, Hu. D.w, C.Y. Chinese. J. Pharm. Sci. 28(1): 45-48 (2008).
9. K. Richter, R. oritel and W. kirch. J. Chromatogr. A. 729(1-2): 293-296 (1996).
10. F. Don, F. Itaf, B.D.R. Elizabeth, S. Domenic. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 17(8): 1455-1459 (1998).
11. D. Rajasekar, I. Jaswanth Kumar and P. Venkateswarlu. European J. Mass Spectrometry 15(6): 715-721(2009).
12. W. Yao R and Lin. Zhongguo Yaofang. 18(17): 22-23(2009).
13. Z. Zhang, F. Lin and J. Yu. Harbin Yike Daxue Xuebao. 43(1):79-81(2009).
14. A. Jonczyk and Z. Nowakowska. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutical Drug Research. 58(5): 339-344, (2001).
15. G. N. Menon and L. B. White. J. Pharma. Sci. 70(9): 1083-1085, (1981).
16. G. Carlucci, G. Palumbo, P. Mazzeo and M. Giovanna quaglia. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 23(1): 185-189, (2000).
17. J. Kirschbaum and S. Perlman. Pharm. Sci. 73(5): 686-687 (1984).
18. C.Tian, Y.Huo, K. Bi and X. Chen. Determination of hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma after given compound irbesartan dispersible tablets by LC-MS. 17(4): 229-231 (2008).
19. Y. Li, J.Y. Chen, D.Z. Wang, K. X. Li, L. Liu and C. H. Sun. Chinese New Drugs Journal. 14(11): 1335-1338 (2005).
20. P.V. Godse, A.V. Bhosale, S.B. Yogesh, D.B. Inter. J. Chem. Sci. 7(3):1733-1745 (2009).
21. D. Chen and S. Huang. Chinese. J. Chromatograms. 44(17): 1346-1349 (2009).
22. K. Safeer, B. Anbarasi and N. Senthil Kumar. Int. J. Chem Tech Research. 2(1): 21-25 (2010).
23. L. Quin, W. Lu, S. Hongwei, Z. Hui and Y. Lun. Zhongguo Linchuang Yaolixue Zahi. 25(4): 341-345 (2009).
24. B. Singh, D. K. Patel and S. K. Ghosh. Tropical Journal of Pharmacetical Research. 8(6):539-543(2009).
25. P. Dash, S. N. Das and S. K. Mahapatra. Pharmbit. 18(2): 119-123 (2008).
26. J. An, S. Yu, Y. Zhang and Y. Wang. Zhongguo Yaofang. 20(23): 1785-1787 (2009).
27. L. Si, Z. Fan, H. Jiangeng and G. Li. Yiyao Daobao. 27(4): 383-385 (2008).
28. S. S. Qutab, S. N. Razzaq, M. Ashfaq, Z. A. Shuja, I. U. Khan. Acta Chromatographica. 19:119-129 (2007).
29. N. Erk J. Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies. 26(15): 2581-2591(2003).
30. J. Han. Shenzhen Guoyao. 18(6): 1408-1409 (2007).
31. J. Lei, X. Zhang, Z. Zhuo, K. Zhu P. Sun and Qi Fan. Yaowe Fenxi Zazhi. 27(4): 566-568 (2007).
32. E.M. Alaa Khedr. Chinese. J. Pharma. Sciences . 27(4): 566-568 (2007).
33. F. Lara Tutunji, F. Maha Tutunji, M. I. Alzoubi, M. H. Khabbas, and A. I. Arida. Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 51(4): 985-990 (2010).
34. J. Wu, Q. Guo and Chunxia. Zhongguo Yaoshi. 12(4): 464-466 (2009).
35. C. Tain, J. Lian, K. Bi and X. Chen. Zhongguo Yaoshi. 11(11): 1282-1284 (2008).
36. Y. Ding, X. Fan, J. Shen and X. Wang. Zhongguo Yaoke Daxue Xuebao. 36(6): 551-555 (2005).
37. J. Zhu, S. You and X. Meng. Zhongguo Yiyao Gongye Zazhi. 34 (11): 567-568 (2003).
38. K.Balamuralikrishna, K.Mahendra B.Syama Sundar.Der Pharma Chemica, 3(1): 490-496 (2011)
39. C. R. Rhem, J. B. Smith. J. American. Pharma. Associa. 49(6): 386-389 (2006).
40. S. Mariusz, A. Maslanka, K. Jan. J. Liq. Chromato. Relat. Techno. 31(13): 1892-1902 (2008).
41. H. B. Metha, B. S. Morge. J. Planar. Chromato. Mod. TLC. 21(3): 173-176 (2008).
42. N. Rahman, M. R. Siddiqui, S. N. Azmi. Chem Pharma Bull. 54(5): 626-31 (2006).
43. H. E. Abdellatef. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrose. 66(4-5): 1248-54 (2007).
44. J. A. Murillo Pulgarin, A. Alanon Molina and G. Perez Olivares nieto. Analytica Chimica Acta. 518(1-2): 37-43 (2004).
45. M. A. Gotardo, L. Pezza and H. R. Pezza. Eclet. Quim. 30(2): 2005.
46. M. C. F. Ferraro, P. M. Casellano and T. S. Kaufman, J. Pharma.Biomed. Analy. 30(2): 1121-1131(2002).
47. A. L. Magri, F. Balestrieri, F. Magri and A. D. Marini. Talanta. 42(11): 1719-1723 (1995).
48. M. N. Bhatia, M. S. Bhatia, P. B. Choudhari and K.B.Ingale. J. Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care. 2(1): 2-14 (2010).
49. N. Erk. Phrmazie. 58(11): 796-800 (2003).
50. N. Erk. Pharmazie. 58(8): 543-548(2003).
51. I. Albero, V. Rodenas, S. Garcia and C. Sanchez-pedreno. J Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 29(1-2):292-305 (2002).
52. C. Vetuschi, A. Giannandrea, G. Carlucci and P. Mazzeo. Farmaco. 60(8): 665-670(2005).
53. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines (Q2R1). Validation of analytical. Validation of analytical procedures: Text and Methodology. International Conference on Harmonization, European commission, Japan and USA (2005).
54. ICH guideline Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures, Step-3: Q2A, 1994.
55. ICH-Q2B Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996.
Received on 26.12.2011 Modified on 23.01.2012
Accepted on 12.02.2012 © AJRC All right reserved
Asian J. Research Chem. 5(4): April 2012; Page 472-476